Kyle Sinckler cited
Kyle Sinckler cited
Re: Kyle Sinckler cited
Re: Kyle Sinckler cited
Not1eyed wrote:Good. Dickson heard it and I thought he should have dealt with it there and then, straight red card for me
I thought the same. Whoever was commentating said something about knowing each other from Quins, but it should have been red.
Re: Kyle Sinckler cited
What would be more fitting is the RFU stepping in and charging him for bringing the game into disrepute.
Re: Kyle Sinckler cited
Re: Kyle Sinckler cited
This sort of behaviour needs to be stamped down on. Gives such a terrible image of the game at the highest level and may encourage any young players watching.
Re: Kyle Sinckler cited
Simmo468 wrote:Whilst it absolutely be felt with it not sure the citing board will be able to see it through. It was clearly heard by the referee who opted to not take action. The Citing panel remit is to review incidents that were missed is it not? I’m sure if that is the case Bristol can challenge it.
What would be more fitting is the RFU stepping in and charging him for bringing the game into disrepute.
From the RFU regs...
Citing Commissioners may cite players for an act(s) of foul play detected by the Match Officials (referee, assistant referee or TMO) and which may have been the subject of referee action. As a general rule, the Citing Commissioner should carefully consider the actions taken by the Match Officials and support the on-field decision and only consider taking action if it is ‘clear and obvious’, based on all the evidence available to the Citing Commissioner post-match, that the player actions justify a citing (red card equivalent) or Citing Commissioner Warning.
Re: Kyle Sinckler cited
Re: Kyle Sinckler cited
LCD smirking at the penalty doesn't look that good either.
Re: Kyle Sinckler cited
Up the jumper wrote:Simmo468 wrote:Whilst it absolutely be felt with it not sure the citing board will be able to see it through. It was clearly heard by the referee who opted to not take action. The Citing panel remit is to review incidents that were missed is it not? I’m sure if that is the case Bristol can challenge it.
What would be more fitting is the RFU stepping in and charging him for bringing the game into disrepute.
From the RFU regs...
Citing Commissioners may cite players for an act(s) of foul play detected by the Match Officials (referee, assistant referee or TMO) and which may have been the subject of referee action. As a general rule, the Citing Commissioner should carefully consider the actions taken by the Match Officials and support the on-field decision and only consider taking action if it is ‘clear and obvious’, based on all the evidence available to the Citing Commissioner post-match, that the player actions justify a citing (red card equivalent) or Citing Commissioner Warning.
Thanks for correcting me
