Re: Rumours

MrGlawsRocker 14 Jun 2019 22:20 pm said..

TOBIAS wrote:Being in the Criminal Law business all my working life I have always had a problem with verdicts. A jury has to be sure that the pros have proved their case or not as the case may be. A guilty verdict may not actully mean somone is actally guilty as charged lkewise if someone is found not guilty it may not mean that they are. This is all within the province of the seleted jury. I have had many cases over the years when I thought a clinet had no chance but have been acquitted likewise when I thought the evidence didn`t stack up there have been convictions. My point is that I do like the Scottish version of not proven but I doubt very much that this alternative will ever be introduced in ths Country. Just my opinion and I wouldn`t know what my felow profesionals would opine

My father and I discussed this at length and agree with you. Also listened to a ton of podcasts regarding the pros and cons of the Jury System, which is an incredibly interesting subject in of itself.
In Ackermann we Trust.
Posts: 915
User avatar
On the board

Re: Rumours

Russglos 14 Jun 2019 23:32 pm said..

Lebowski wrote:I would actually agree, although frankly this rather ceased to be a rumours thread months ago.

Personally I would like us to have two rumours threads; one for Glos and one for other stuff, and for them to be kept fairly sanitised, although that may be unrealistic. I say this because like many others I suspect I have very little interest in rumours about other clubs.

+1 Hope you're well Leb.
Posts: 389

Re: Rumours

Still Realistic 15 Jun 2019 17:04 pm said..

Sheddy Mcshedface wrote:Or, and this is a bit wild but stick with me, we have a rumours thread for rumours and people start threads for other topics as and when they become relevant?

It will never catch on!!! :lol:
Posts: 1917
Still Realistic
Hall of Famer

Return to Gloucester Rugby

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], Noobs, West Oxon Glaws and 18 guests